No.250 : The Ripper (TV) (2020)

The Ripper (TV) 2020 at the IMDb

 I was born in 1971 and in many ways the Yorkshire Ripper was my first experience of an ongoing hunt for a serial killer. I do have a distinct memory of the murder of Jacqueline Hill being reported in November 1980 and of it being the talk of the schoolyard. Fortunately she was the last victim, with Peter Sutcliffe being arrested soon after, after being picked up for offences unrelated to his murders.

I have been interested in the case and enjoyed a three part pod cast on the Case File site  which I’d strongly recommend. It went into greater depth than the Netflix TV show we are discussing now, but they are clearly different approaches to the same horrific crimes.

This Netflix documentary series is in four parts of roughly an hour each. They are presented in chronological order with the first setting the scene, the middle two covering the murders and the investigation and the last dealing with Peter Sutcliffe’s capture and the fallout of the investigation which, by all accounts, was botched and contributed to at least some of the murders being allowed to happen.

The series uses mainly archive footage and is pretty familiar in its approach, with a voiceover explaining what is happening set against news reports and newspaper headlines of the time. What sets this series apart however, is the present day interviews with many of the key players, which  included the son of one of the early victims who relives the trauma of learning of his mother’s demise and her character assassination in the press who dubbed her as a prostitute.

Other talking heads include Bruce Jones of Coronation Street fame who discovered one of the bodies as well as police personnel and journalists who worked the case at the time. I didn’t learn too much from this series, but what was done well was the telling of the story with events laid out in chronological order with graphics showing where each of the women died, relative to each other.

They also delved into Sutcliffe’s other crimes, many of which were forgotten when his 13 murders were being discussed. Several women survived his assaults and it was haunting to hear their first hand accounts of their encounters with the maniac.

The clear message from the series was one of police incompetence. The Ripper was interviewed nine times, with one officer telling us that he told his bosses that he had found the suspect only to be rebuffed owing to Sutcliffe not fitting the profile that had been created. There was also a lot of content devoted to the misogyny of the police and the public’s attitude towards the victims who were painted as worthless due to some being prostitutes. This was a valid thread for the programme but they did spend a lot of time on it with lots of opinions being offered about contemporary attitudes. 

This was fine and laudable but it was at the expense of other aspects of the case being unexplored - Sutcliffe himself didn’t get much of a profile with his motivations being largely untouched. We know he’s a nutter but what took him to that place and what made him so adept at murder and at evading capture? The other villain of the piece, the hoaxer ‘Weirside Jack’, was also not discussed in depth which was a shame as this was a thread the show left hanging. The hoaxes, which were bought wholesale by the police, contributed greatly to at least three murders being allowed to happen and I’d liked to have seen this aspect being explored. I did read up on it and the miscreant concerned got 8 years after a cold case investigation captured him in 2000.

Overall this was a well made and compelling series that paid due respect to the victims involved and highlighted the issues that led this murderer the chance to run free for a decade. It’s hopeful that lessons have been learned as it was clear that the policemen involved in this investigation couldn’t find their arse with both hands. At the end it was blind luck that netted the Ripper with the police investigation being as much use as a cock flavoured lollypop.

This was a crime of its time that will never happen again due to advances in DNA detection, CCTV and computing. The police were clearly negligent but the crimes belonged to one man alone, and that shouldn’t be forgotten amongst all the finger pointing.

This was a good and worthwhile effort but it was too short with the ending seeming somewhat rushed. The material could easily have filled 12 one hour episodes and I hope a ‘director’s cut’ that explores all the hanging threads is in the works.

The Tag Line : Ripper Yarns   70%

No.166 : The Spy (TV) (2019)

The Spy at the IMDb

In a change to our regular programming let’s have a look at this 6 part TV mini series that you’ll find on Netflix.

Written and directed by the chap who made the series that became ‘Homeland’ The Spy tells the true life story of Eli Cohen a top Mossad agent in the 1960s.

The series opens with Eli, played by Sacha Baron Cohen having trouble in getting into the army. His persistence pays off however when he is recruited as a spy after passing some elaborate tests. These were good fun such as 'spot the trail' with some good tips for wannabe stalkers.

He gets the job, but we know it won’t end well as we’ve already had a flash forward of him having his fingernails ripped out - or could this just be a particularly aggressive manicurist?

He starts out in Argentina in a bid to create a false identity as a Syrian businessman. Things start on a small scale with newspapers being sent home as wrappers for his pot export bisiness giving juicy titbits for his handlers.

Soon he is in Syria itself but drawing the attention of Dr Bashir off Deep Space Nine who wears the same scowl in every scene and says very little. Eli however is having fun hosting parties for influential people whilst tapping out messages for those back in Israel.

As the last episode nears we know the end is nigh, as Eli gets too confident and takes too many risks. Can it end well for him and his long suffering wife? Will his antics in the 1960’s solve the Middle Eastern troubles? Probably not.

This was a great series which is well worth the investment of 6 hours of your time. The 1960s settings are well realised and I liked the modern touches such as the Morse code being tapped out in letters on the screen and signs being translated as characters walked by them.

Baron Cohen is excellent as his namesake Eli, and it’s easy to buy how much information he gains through his charm and bravado.

The tension ratchets up as the series continues as the noose slowly tightens - literally! As with a lot of spy series the tension is in the editing, with Eli tapping away as the detector van turns the corner - quick turn it off!

The home front parts were less engaging with the wife doing her best to raise the kids whilst fending off the horny handler.

I hadn’t known about this story before and although some dramatic licence is seemingly used, it is an amazing story of bravery and ultimately hubris.

Some bits, such as a 5 year old Osama bin Laden showing up were a bit on the nose, but for the most part it was compelling and fascinating stuff.

THE Tag Line : Very Nice!  80%